Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Grafting Material: A Systematic Review

doi:10.3390/biomimetics9090518

★ Alto impactoQ1 · Computer ScienceImpact Factor · 4.339

AutoresDiba Ghodsian, Sofía D’Jesús, Luis Sánchez‐Labrador, Carlos Cobo-Vázquez, Jorge Cortés‐Bretón Brinkmann, José María Martínez González, Cristina Méniz-García

Por qué importa

Esta revisión sistemática analiza la viabilidad y seguridad del uso de material de injerto autólogo de diente para la elevación del seno maxilar, comparándolo con otros sustitutos óseos. Se evaluaron datos histomorfométricos, histológicos, estabilidad primaria de implantes, complicaciones y altura ósea radiográfica, incluyendo siete estudios con 128 participantes. Aunque los resultados sugieren que el injerto dental autólogo es una alternativa factible y segura, los autores advierten que estas conclusiones deben tomarse con cautela debido a la limitada evidencia científica actual y la heterogeneidad de los estudios analizados. Esta información es relevante para los clínicos que realizan procedimientos de regeneración ósea en el maxilar superior, ofreciendo una perspectiva sobre materiales de injerto alternativos y sus implicaciones clínicas.

Abstract original

The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether autogenous tooth grafting material (ATGM) is as safe and effective as other bone substitutes used for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures, evaluating histomorphometric and/or histological data, implant primary stability, associated complications and radiographic bone height measurements. An automated electronic search was conducted using four databases (Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library), supplemented by a manual search, to identify clinical human studies using particulate ATGM for the aforementioned procedure. The included studies had a sample size of at least four patients and were published before 31st July 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist were used to assess the risk of bias in cohort studies and case series, respectively. Seven studies were included in the descriptive analysis, obtaining 128 participants (46.8% only treated with ATGM) and 192 placed implants. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, meta-analysis could not be performed. The authors concluded that ATGM appears to be a feasible and safe alternative for maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited amount of scientific evidence on this topic and the heterogeneity between the included studies.

Leer texto completo ↗DOI · 10.3390/biomimetics9090518

Autor Doctor&Cols

Carlos M. Cobo Vázquez
Cirugía Oral e Implantología

Cómo citar

Ghodsian D, D’Jesús S, Sánchez‐Labrador L, Cobo-Vázquez C, Brinkmann JC, González JMM, et al. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Grafting Material: A Systematic Review. Biomimetics. 2024. doi:10.3390/biomimetics9090518