Autor Doctor&Cols
Cómo citar
Gonçalves DDS, Cura M, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays. Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 21(1). 2017. doi:10.1007/s00784-016-1782-7
AutoresDayana Da Silva Gonçalves; M. Cura; Laura Ceballos; M. Victoria Fuentes
Este estudio investiga cómo la elevación de la caja proximal afecta la resistencia de unión de las incrustaciones de composite en el suelo de la caja proximal, utilizando cementos resinosos de grabado total o autoconsistentes. Los resultados indican que la elevación de la caja proximal mejora significativamente la resistencia de unión con cementos autoconsistentes, mientras que no se observan diferencias notables con cementos de grabado total independientemente de la posición del margen cervical. Clínicamente, esto sugiere que la elevación de la caja proximal es una técnica que no compromete la longevidad de las restauraciones indirectas en el suelo proximal, independientemente del tipo de cemento resinoso empleado, ofreciendo así flexibilidad en el diseño de la preparación.
Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of proximal box elevation on microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of composite inlays to the proximal box floor, using either a total-etch or a self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and methods: Twenty-five human molars were selected, and a class II OM (inlay) cavity preparation was performed in each tooth. Cavities were randomly assigned into four experimental groups, according to the location of the proximal cervical margin (located 1 mm below cementoenamel junction (CEJ), or with proximal box elevation with composite resin) and the resin cement used for luting (a total-etch resin cement RelyX ARC or a self-adhesive resin cement G-Cem). After 1-week water storage, samples were subjected to mTBS test. Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (p < 0.05). Results: Kruskal–Wallis revealed statistically significant differences among experimental groups (p = 0.007). Both resin cements showed similar bond strength values when cervical margin was located below CEJ. The proximal box elevation improved the bond strength of composite inlays for both resin cements. However, only for G-Cem was this improvement statistically significant. Conclusions: The proximal box elevation improved the bond strength attained by G-Cem resin cement. For RelyX ARC, the position of the cervical margin did not affect composite inlays bond strength. Clinical relevance: Proximal box elevation does not decline bond strength of composite inlays to the proximal floor when a total-etch or a self-adhesive resin cement is used.
Gonçalves DDS, Cura M, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV. Influence of proximal box elevation on bond strength of composite inlays. Clinical Oral Investigations, Vol. 21(1). 2017. doi:10.1007/s00784-016-1782-7
Factors influencing the agreement between teachers and students in the assessment of preclinical endodontics using a rubric
Rubric vs. numeric rating scale: agreement among evaluators on endodontic treatments performed by dental students
Influence of the adhesive strategy in the sealing ability of resin composite inlays after deep margin elevation
caso_clinico · Pablo Pavon Fraile
DEA: diseñar el perfil de emergencia antes de colocar el implante en brechas cicatrizadas
caso_clinico · Guillermo García Pardellas
Rehabilitación oral completa por desgaste severo con registro digital de los movimientos mandibulares
caso_clinico · Patricia Mora Cañizarez
Mejorando sonrisas con resina compuesta por técnica directa: estratificación guiada por una llave palatina
caso_clinico · Javier de la Torre Sanchez
Carillas inyectadas en el sector anterosuperior: una técnica aditiva que se decide en la planificación